>> I found out who the parents where (divorced, different locations) drove to both their houses, and said, "If your kid doesn't stop today, you, your kid and your family, are not safe outside this door. I never said this."
Hello, restraining order.
Seriously, there are good ways to deal with situations like this. Threatening people is not one of those ways.
Okay, I'll call that. Have you tried to get a restraining order? Do you know what's involved?
I've tried: Here's what you get:
What proof do you have?
What is your relationship to that person?
They deny it, how do you respond?
More bullying, because they know you tried to go through the system, which favors the aggressor because authorities are too busy putting pot smokers behind bars.
I think the first step should be reasonable discourse with the bullies parents, not threatening them. But I also think that threatening people can be a good solution. In the past I was involved in a situation where the law just couldn't really do anything until it was probably too late. A simple quick threat later, and the problem went away. I'm not saying I'm proud of it, or that I prefer it as a solution, but we're still animals, and we respond to threats.
a) A whole lot of people have been figuratively buried clutching a piece of paper with the title "Restraining Order".
b) cognivore, who knows what he's talking about, was not the harasser. He would have absolutely no intention of violating a restraining order, unless his threat failed, in which case he'd violate it once, but for much, much higher stakes.
Your final statement needs some support, and I don't see any in this topic.
Hello, restraining order.
Seriously, there are good ways to deal with situations like this. Threatening people is not one of those ways.