Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Users don't, but I'll bet a lot of hackers do. Apparently it has had an effect on rankings - what you consider to be "little effect" can be huge deal to someone whose business relies heavily on referrals from Google. And the speed difference that I've experienced is actually quite noticeable.

edit: To give some concrete data, I took the queries I've done on Google today and compared the first page of results. Roughly 40% of the results were ranked differently than they were before. News results were more recent with Caffeine. Previous requests took perhaps, 1/2 a second to display - it's relatively instantaneous now.



I am wondering, however, if the display time is faster now because the new site doesn't have much user load where the old google site is relatively busy.

The claim about 'faster' is that newer search results show up sooner than they did on the old google. That is, new results get indexed for display earlier.


Hackers like me would be interested in what they have done even if it made no significant difference to the end results.

I think there main go here is trying to position them self against all the new real time search offerings.


What have you learned about what they have done that is interesting?


Well nothing but I mean it would be interesting, should they happen to go into a technical explanation.


Interestingly, stack overflow is not popular with Caffeine...

"HTTP Requests optimization": 2nd result with old Google. Not in the first 3 pages with Caffeine.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: