A hackintosh is only an option when you don't mind breaking your word. In fact, this is why I bought a Mac mini instead of built a Hackintosh; I even wrote Tim Cook about a "system builder" license being something I'd dream of. The license explicitly states that you agree to install OSX on only Apple-approved/sold hardware (paraphrased).
I'm aware of most the arguments why EULAs are unenforceable, why/how to bypass them, etc, but is any of that honest?
I'm aware of most the arguments why EULAs are unenforceable, why/how to bypass them, etc, but is any of that honest?