Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I like the idea here, but the final product is just so far from what good interactive articles/explanations actually look like. E.g., this style of article:

- https://mlu-explain.github.io/decision-tree/

- any article from distill.pub

- any piece from NYT



Don’t you dare forget https://ciechanow.ski/


Good call, I'm sure I've left off a lot of amazing work, and his is certainly top class!


This is an absolute wealth of information about gravitational mechanics but quite a few of the diagrams were so alien to me that they became undecipherable.


There is much more than the one article. Check the archives.


It's about what I thought would be possible. I look forward to things of the calibre of redblobgames, but perhaps no this year.


That decision-tree page is killer!


And those are all auto-generated?


Of course they are not. That is the whole point.


The author confirms that they ARE, so what's your "of course they are not" about? You might have misunderstood my obvious meaning: is the output webpage fully generated without human tweaking just from the paper alone?


You asked that on a post with examples of data journalism articles which are obviously not AI generated. So when you say ask about „those“ it was clear to me that you meant these examples.


All of the links I posted were published before ChatGPT, no AI.


If by "auto-generated" you mean, does the LLM generate the output from the input, then yes.


Yes, exactly what I mean. Thanks.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: