I like the idea here, but the final product is just so far from what good interactive articles/explanations actually look like. E.g., this style of article:
This is an absolute wealth of information about gravitational mechanics but quite a few of the diagrams were so alien to me that they became undecipherable.
The author confirms that they ARE, so what's your "of course they are not" about? You might have misunderstood my obvious meaning: is the output webpage fully generated without human tweaking just from the paper alone?
You asked that on a post with examples of data journalism articles which are obviously not AI generated. So when you say ask about „those“ it was clear to me that you meant these examples.
- https://mlu-explain.github.io/decision-tree/
- any article from distill.pub
- any piece from NYT