Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I can only tell you my experience as a newcomer to PostHog last year. I went to try it out, and visited the documentation to figure out how to get it up and running. The documentation sent a very clear message of “You’d be a fucking idiot to put this into production. The open-source version is pathetic and can’t handle real traffic. Pay us.”. This immediately killed all interest I had in PostHog and I didn’t go any further. Your open-source version doesn’t have to scale indefinitely, but if you can’t stand behind your open-source version at all, I don’t trust your commercial version at all either. A closed-source product is preferable to an open-source product where the maintainers strongly warn people not to use it.


Well said, especially in the context of their GitHub tagline:

    PostHog provides open-source product analytics, session 
    recording, feature flagging and A/B testing that you can self-host.


This is well said and I agree. It is disingenuous and raises cognitive dissonance to offer something but not stand behind it and in fact warn people NOT to use it.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: