I know I am missing something. The article says they superimposed a model's head over David's body, and what I imagined was the statue with a Photoshop of someone else's head on it. Instead, what I see in the image included in the article is an entirely different head and body. Only the pose is the same. I suppose there must be some different image, not shown, that is the actual subject of the suit, as this one is clearly not infringing any conceivable copyright. The other alternative, too insane to consider, is that they can somehow copyright a pose. Obviously I'm just confused, but I don't get it.