Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Tesla FSD is quickly becoming less of a software problem and more of a problem of semantics.

If the car drives someone to and from work 30 days in a row without a problem, is it truly FSD? What about 300 days? Where do you draw the line? 1000x safer than the average human?

Same thing here will AI. How many conversations with GTP-X need to happen without a stupid response from GTP before we call it real world AI?



How about first getting to "as safe/performant as a non-drunk, non-sleep-deprived, non-brand-new driver with 0 human intervention" before asking more advanced questions?

Tesla FSD is definitely nowhere near that level.


Exactly, your definition of True FSD seems to be when it doesn't ever make mistakes that a drunk or inexperienced person makes.

Other people's definition of True FSD comes down to safety (Rate of FSD caused deaths vs Rate of Human caused deaths).


Do we account for stupid responses from humans in human communication in the targets?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: