Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | whynyc's commentslogin

This fine-as-tax trend is worrying. I propose crypto burn instead. It hurts the wrongdoer while not creating bad incentive for regulators. Win-Win.


No, please not. Crypto burn only makes crypto coins owner richer. That is the opposite of what taxes, even as fines, are for.


Agree that crypto-burn is a bad idea. But I am curious what that 3-5 billion government windfall will go towards.


What does "crypto burn" mean?


It's when you send cryptocurrency to an address nobody has the keys to, or that is the cryptographic equivalent of a black hole (provably inaccessible).

The problem GP is addressing is that the regulators aren't really incentivized to make the bad behavior stop because they are collecting revenue by letting it continue.


Transfering money to unspendable address. For example, $11M in 1CounterpartyXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUWLpVr are unspendable.

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1CounterpartyXXXXXXXX...


Illegal avoidance is called evasion.


Amazon+Google should just team up and lease an uninhabited land somewhere. Max autonomy, max speed. No doubt they can create a singapore in < 5 years.


And just as in that thought experiment, it is entirely obvious how to get to an outcome that is better for everyone: cooperation.

Ya its called being a cartel. 1000+ members cartel (city/state/national govts) is just extremely unstable and short lived. Think Amazon HQ2, Brexit and others as trust busting done by free market. The Cooperation is not going to work.


Now they're turning that all away. It's such an irrational decision that if I were Amazon, it would raise a big red flag for me as well.

Why even pick NYC in first place ? That place, and other 1st tier cities, are red tape hell. Amazon should have known this.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: