Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vram11's commentslogin

Do you have a link for that? Checked their site just now (on mobile though), did not see a relevant link.


What sort of pipeline? Biological?


Yeah, basically using it to fertilize a crop to grow a "green manure" crop for a couple of rounds and then cycling back to food crops.


Jackfruit has a great, rich taste; I like it, although I don't go much for sweet foods generally (I make an exception now and then, for some). The sticky stuff between the edible parts is a bit of a turnoff, though. Not easy to get it off your hands, once on. Also, the fruit has a strong smell, but not a bad one, IMO.

You cannot eat a lot of it, since it is rather dense, though soft.

It's also one of those wonder plants, like neem, banana and coconut, with many uses.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackfruit



The mango has at least an equal claim to be the King of Fruits.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_Fruits


Based on looking up durian in Wikipedia, and having seen large jackfruits in India, I can say that jackfruit can grow much larger.


I was wondering the same, as someone who has eaten jackfruit but never durian.


Thanks.


Unfortunately not. It's not insurance all the way down. Turtles, on the other hand ...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down


Loss from stealing was called 'shrinkage' by retail industry people, in Sam Walton's autobiography 'Made in America'. As you say, they expected to have some. I wonder why it can't be prevented 100%.


Prevention to 100% would be costly. They have diminishing marginal returns.

Why would someone pay $50,000/year for a hypothetical system which would theoretically catch everyone and fill out the police report automatically when the store experiences a tiny $300 annual shrinkage loss?


Because stopping retail theft 100% requires an inconvenience to normal customers that is off-putting and will cause them to go somewhere else.


I certainly wouldn't shop somewhere that required my bags and pockets to be searched every time I left the store.


Lying for Money makes the case that the optimal amount of fraud in any real world system is non-zero. Fraud prevention has direct and indirect costs. At some point the costs of fraud prevention will exceed the cost of fraud itself.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: