1) There are many greek-latin hybrid words in biology (hepatocyte, neurotransmitter, gastrointestinal...).

2) Xenogenesis is a word that already existed before the publication of the article and using the same world could have been confusing: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17901077/.

3) Given than we're talking about a species that lay another species in order to create hybrids, using a word that is ethymologically hybrid sounds like a perfect fit.

I guess you missed the point that M. ibericus and M. structor are at this point of no return: like donkey and horse, they can't interbreed successfully, as hybrids are all workers and can't mate.

One of the author of the study here. Your scenario is very good. The reason why we believe that the second one is way more likely is because there are several other species of the Messor genus that need to hybridize to produce workers, so it's very likely that it's the ancestral state and that male cloning comes after.

Note that this second scenario doesn't necessarily imply that M. structor males are not some sort of parasites. Actually, because it's detrimental to M. structor males to father only workers (they don't transmit their genes to the next generation), it's easy to imagine selection to remove DNA of the mother so they can be cloned in a fertile caste (males). That being said, maternal DNA elimination prompted by the male genome would be nearly immediately also beneficial to M. ibericus (because having M. structor males at home is good for them), so this maternal DNA removing is something that benefits to both partners, which is why it's not that difficult to imagine that it evolved and has been succesfully selected. When something benefits to both partners of any relationship, there are good chances that it will be selected at some point.

That makes a lot of sense! Really appreciate you coming here and explaining