This is actually a reasonable workflow. Although requires some preparation. I’ll try it out!

Yep that's how I do it if I have to deal with stacked PRs. I also just never use rebase once anything has happened in a PR review that incurs historical state, like reviews or other people checking out the branch (that I know of, anyways). I'll rebase while it's local to keep my branch histories tidy, but I'll merge from upstream once shared things are happening. There are a bunch of tools out there for merging/rebasing entire branch stacks, I use https://github.com/dashed/git-chain.

I also branch out, and rebase. Also, keep updating and rebasing until merged. It’s tedious when PR take ages for approval, as I keep creating new branches on top of each other.

So, when I saw this announcement seemed interesting but don’t see the point of it yet.

Can we start appreciating and respecting other people's professional experiences without dismissing and criticising them?

It's well written and brought to light a very interesting subject, e.g. "Marshall’s research showed that just 15-20% of riflemen in active combat positions ever fired their weapons".

Marshall didn't research anything, he just made it up.

Migrating straight away! Thank you!

To be honest, GitHub actions made a big impact at a time when every other CI framework sucked, really badly. Maybe today, others are much better than they used to be!

Killing ourselves working, to pay huge amounts in taxes for this?

Next 30 years? You are probably clueless about taxes here.

I agree, it’s hard to believe. Hopefully the original comment author can share one of those questions.