Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | flexagoon's commentslogin

> Slop fonts: Space Grotesk, Instrument Serif, Geist, Syne, Fraunces

Nooo please don't ruin great fonts by associating them with low effort vibecoding

They may be somewhat overused but they are popular for a reason


yeah lots of these are used by AI because they're good. i use Space Grotesk for headings on my current project, rotheme, with Instrument Sans in the body, and my link shortener project uses Geist.

maybe i'm an LLM too


Don't you mean Copilot 365 .NET SharePoint Document Platform for Windows?

No it's the Word app which is included in your organization's Copilot 365 .NET SharePoint license assuming you know how to trigger the download. The chatbot the license is named after doesn't have a clue either so good luck.

Should be called "out AI" then

> not so much as a default-enabled feature.

The browser opens a popup asking you if you want to grant access to a specific device for a specific website, it's not like random websites can just run adb commands on your phone


Yeah but still, I'd want that to only remotely be a thing. Like require enabling a developer setting for it.

That's a great way to kill adoption of a feature. But what has WebUSB done to you?

Existing. HDR is also on the list.

Why? The permission dialog is crystal clear.

It's only sorta ok right now because nothing uses it normally. If it were used mainstream for some legitimate purpose, that permission dialog would get ignored, and it'd become a security risk. USB isn't something web needs to touch unless you really know what you're doing.

> I remember reading ads about a specific make of vacuum pumps next to an article with experiments which used them.

Doesn't that just create a very obvious conflict of interest and nullify the credibility of the article?


In principle the editorial content might be firewalled, so somebody decided to use vacuum pumps, wrote the article and then the ad department goes huh, call the vacuum pump people and see if they want an advert next to the article.

Obviously you, the reader, cannot know if that's what happened, or whether in reality it was the opposite way around, but maybe you trust the reviewer and believe they wouldn't do the other thing, or at least they would feel morally unable to do the other thing without telling you.

And to some extent that same relationship matters to whether you trust the content anyway, irrespective of advertising. I believe Yahtzee Crosshaw did or did not like the video game, I reckon Yahtzee, for whatever it's worth, isn't lying if he said it was fun.

Or take a more obscure but perhaps more relevant example. "Techmoan" on Youtube says maybe this brand new Asda tape player is the best he's seen in years. It's not great, the equivalent product in the 1980s would have Dolby and it'd be smaller and lighter and generally better, but, it's 2026 and Asda can't buy a 1980s tape player, they would need to invest billions to make one and it makes no economic sense in the era of handheld super-computers to invest so much money to make better tape players. So this one is pretty good, considering. Well that's faint praise, but it is praise. If "Techmoan" says he just bought it to see if it's any good, and here's a link to Asda's website, I believe him. If Asda bought him the tape player or even just paid him to say it, why would he lie? He's an old curmudgeon who loves legacy music formats, he's not going to get rich lying to me, so that makes no sense.


There was some controversy in the music tech space on YouTube because Behringer attacked a YouTuber and reviewer after he gave a product a bad review.

In fact they seem to have tightened up on free review samples in general.

I did some reviewing in the 90s and the magazine had a solid reviews policy - tell the truth even if someone pulls their advertising. Which very much happened on a few occasions.

You can do that if you have no issues with selling ad pages, which Byte clearly didn't.

Whether that was ever generally true for the industry, or is true now with YouTube influencers, is a different question.


Banning bold font and saying to avoid lists and tables as much as possible is an immediate massive improvement to LLM output quality

In uni, maybe. But my experience in middle/high school was that hitting the minimum word count was much more important than actually good writing.

The concept of word count in high school was bonkers. Knowing my teacher wouldn't check, I wrote a dense line with a lot of words, using small print and small words, and then used that as my baseline (so let's say it had 20 words). Then if I needed 200 words total I'd write ten lines, knowing full well that other lines of text would only have 10-15 words.

Cheating? Maybe. But it's a silly metric to begin with, and obviously the teacher didn't actually care about the count because I got an A in most of my essays.


Yes - US high school instruction in writing is something I have to spend weeks un-teaching in first year and majors courses.

I'm not in the US, I guess English classes are just like that around the world.

As a non-native speaker, I learned so much more by just watching YouTube in English than in middle and high school English classes combined


And having a topic sentence, and sometimes even deliberately using rhetorical devices like parallelism that a LLM detector would flag up.

> crypto can be traced

Anna's Archive exclusively uses Monero, which can't be by design


No idea how an MCP is relevant to the discussion, it still needs a working domain name to talk to the service.

But, https://github.com/iosifache/annas-mcp


His point is that you don't need a working domain name since the MCP can just hardcode the IPs of the servers or resolve them through any other method that isn't DNS.

There is an LLM button on every other website now. "Chat with your lesson", "chat with your food", "chat with your photos". People are not clicking them because they are just visual noise at this point.

have you noticed the obnoxious coloured swirly around the "chat with x" buttons too? just in case you didnt notice the button...

It was honestly a very cool gimmick few years ago, when it was new. Chatting with your photos, imagine that! ... then after few tries you're like "well... I just want the last 10 photos because I want to share a photo of my son playing piano to his grand parents" and the UX, because it's actually well craft based on feedback from users, not only has a button for just that... but even default to this.

So... yeah, it got old quick. Genuinely cool for a bit but now "we" as users just want good UX. Now give me the FAQ that I can search through then an email if it's not in there.

PS: FWIW I do believe in a long-tail fashion, for few users who are not into scripting, might not be developers (or believe they could become) it could help find very few very niche use cases with solutions.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: