Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | darknavi's commentslogin

I enjoyed "live albums" a lot growing up.

The Mark, Tom, and Travis show was always a blast to listen to with my friends.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mark,_Tom,_and_Travis_Show...!)


This was one of the first - if not the first - CD I bought for myself, using my own (allowance) money! I was probably too young to listen to it, but blink-182 is my favorite band and I listened to this CD so many times that I pretty much memorized all the stupid banter between tracks.

I also liked sharing certain tracks with my friends when they came over...


HN thinks the exclamation point is punctuation and not part of the URL. Luckily wikipedia has a redirect already set up that will work: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Mark,_Tom,_an...

If you use Merlin Bird ID and have an outdoor microphone (a camera with a RTSP stream will do!) this is a fun app to self-host.

I looked for something like this a few years ago and the only solution I could find for self-hosting was BirdNET-pi, which was dated even then.

Hope some birders find this fun, I am happy to have stumbled upon it this weekend.


That's probably intentional on the DOJ's part at this point.

not sure why you think it's intentional. But, created a github issue, and will work on that today/tonight.. yay GLM 5.1 :)

https://github.com/vidluther/pardonned/issues/23


I meant it's probably intentional that the data being represented differently on the DOJ's website, not your tracker website.

Stuff like this is very common. For example, at the start of Trump's second term, the whitehouse history page was changed to make democrat presidents look bad -

https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/the-white-h...


That link is entirely about the East Wing ballroom expansion. I don't see any criticism of anyone there.

Swipe through the "Major Events Timeline". It would be funny if it wasn't so sad how petty it is.

Good lord, this is so pathetic

>not sure why you think it's intentional

It's entirely on brand.


clinton-1 and clinton-2 are distinct. I think it's more likely collected differently. The people gathering data will change. Someone with different data standards worked there for a while.

I can't tell if you're being satirical or if this is some 1984 re-writing of history, but Twitter definitely banned linking to other social media websites under Elon's rule.

> "We know that many of our users may be active on other social media platforms; however, going forward, Twitter will no longer allow free promotion of specific social media platforms on Twitter," the company said in a statement.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/twitter-bans-linking-to...

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/18/business/twitter-ban-soci...


> under Elon's rule

that's precisely what I assumed

Genuinely thanks for doing the effort of looking for sources and correcting someone you thought was wrong, but the allegation of me singlehandedly (just the thought! :D) trying to rewrite history maybe goes a bit far when I said it was just my assumption and that I don't know of such a thing before elonmusk took over


You seem to have misunderstood them because they are saying the same thing.

Don't know why downvoted, this is correct. Thanks for pointing it out sooner than I got around to

Verify what?

The shapes match.

You think this is some kind of hoax?

No but I’d like an answer for the people that claim that.

I agree with "don't talk to those people". If they don't believe this picture, why would they believe a weather satellite picture?

Just don't talk to them

Corresponding with family members? What do you want them to use, Teams?

A small ask: Don't have the main tag like for your product refer to another product. I know what Docker Hub is, but I have no idea what Trufflehog is.

The first like of the GitHub README is much better IMO: layerleak the Docker Hub Secret Scanner


Thanks for the advice! Did not even consider that. I just updated it


Isn't that actually great? Just never create and sign into a Walmart account and now your TV isn't infected.


This presumes that, now or later, there won't be an on-screen message that can't be dismissed saying "Sign in to a Walmart account to enable all TV features."

There's plenty of ways they can interfere with attempts to use the TV in "dumb" mode. Heck it could refuse to show any video at all til you've signed in.


Yep. I bought a Samsung TV that I never even put online. It pops up with a half-screen display that lasts for 2 minutes every time I turn it on . Never again.


What is the half-screen display? On my Samsung S90D (new within the last year or so), I can set it to skip the "home" screen and go directly to the last input on power on. It works well.


A manufacturer can target multiple markets and make different choices for different markets.

The Samsung S90D (a 65" 4K model) you bought appears to sell for about $1000. Looking at Best Buy's site, you can also buy a Samsung 65" 4K TV for as little as $180 (model DU6900).

Yes, there's other differences. LED vs OLED etc. But at a glance they seem equivalent to a consumer...and one costs 5x more. The $1000 TV is targeting a market that expects more from their purchase and would potentially grate at a persistent sign-in notification. The <$200 TV is targeting a market that wants a big TV and hasn't thought much past that.

There's definitely a chance that on some models Samsung would be more aggressive about enabling smart features, because those models are expected to be subsidized by ads.


While all of that is certainly true, even the DU6900 has the "Start with Smart Hub Home" option that defaults to enabled but can be disabled according to its manual. I assume that's what OP is seeing; it's a common thing to want to disable on Samsung TVs.


I'm not at home currently so can't check, but you might be right about what it is. I'll definitely have to check! I do remember being nagged to connect to wifi though, but it might be a combination or something. I appreciate you mentioning this because if I can just disable it, that would actually improve my life :-)


It's like poor people living in the crowded business district with little peace and giant billboards shining in the bedroom window.


There are free TVs now that are completely subsidized by ads: https://www.telly.com/

But don't think people who can afford the more expensive TV are also more tech-savvy. Some just want a nicer TV. Also, they are a much more lucrative target market than people who cannot afford the nicer TV.


I finally saw one of these in person last year!

It was as fascinating as it was terrifying.

It had a noticable array of sensors and (I think?) microphones along with a camera smack dab in the middle. Above that was its permanent ad display. The TV also has access to its own portal, which was what was on when I saw it. An AI-generated reporter was talking about entertainment news.

Not even Orwell could've imagined a better telescreen than this. You know it's chock full of anti-defeat protections to prevent curious minds from scoring a free TV.


Samsung is top of my list of companies to never buy from.

Except SSDs, I guess. Would be nice if I could meaningfully reject all products from a given company. I'm sure they'll someday cram ads and spyware into those also.


2 minutes. I think I would have boxed that up and returned it to the store as broken.


Heh, I really almost did. It started a big fight with the wife, and I lost the battle quickly. Not a day goes by that I don't wish I'd fought that fight.


They can't do that later if you never sign in. If they do that now, you just refuse their terms, get a refund.


I get that they could do this in a future update, but if you never connect it to the Internet, a TV that doesn't require it today isn't going to just start. (Unless they pregamed to do it on such-and-such-a-date, but that would be a nightmare for their legal department if the rules change)


Pi-Hole sped up my Samsung home and menu screens tremendously. I use something like this list [0]. The growing size of the list itself is a testament to the enshittification of Smart TVs.

I wonder if the SmartTV blocklist change history and size of commits could tell a historical story of how things have evolved? I'm aware that DoH makes this approach less and less viable ... but for my existing TVs it still seems to work fine as long as I'm careful not to blindly update.

[0] https://github.com/Perflyst/PiHoleBlocklist/blob/master/Smar...


It's not exactly brain surgery, is it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THNPmhBl-8I


I do nightly offsite mirroring (just to a cloud provider) and making that go faster and not cannibalize all of my throughput is nice.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: