Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dabbz's commentslogin

It's a very frequently used structure by LLMs especially ones writing for LinkedIn.


"It's not X, it's Y."

A linguistic presentation commonly referred to as constrastive negation.


Humans may use commas here, but LLMs always use a full stop, always.


I wonder if there's a single trainer in Kenya who is responsible for some of the conventions we see so often. Maybe (s)he just really likes full stops and used them in all of the training examples.


Was looking for a precise term for that. Thank you!

Also AI-Linkedin-Bullshit likes to use "just" additionally and it's mostly along the lines of Y being something much more impactful then X.


Oh are compilers going away? Or personal computers for that matter?

If the barrier to button-pressed companies goes that high up, the cost to run/consume the product also goes up. Making hand-rolled products cheaper.

Slower paced to roll out things? Sure.

That's the precarious balance these LLMs providers have to make. They can't just move on without the people feeding it data and value. The machine is not perpetual.


I believe the Shared Payment Token is interchangeable with a payment method id that you attach to a customer object, but that link has very sparse information about how things actually work end to end and what objects mean what.


Nobody cares until the automated trust and safety bot bans an account for no apparent reason and you can't contact a human for help. Before that happens though, how do you get someone to care? I suppose it's risk management at that point. "What are the odds that I'll get inconvenienced by Instagram before the ROI on establishing on their platform pays out"


To be fair, Google Search does this to sites too. Small sites can see all their traffic disappear within a few days if an algorithm update goes against them. And there is zero recourse.


> Before that happens though, how do you get someone to care?

You don't. Only a relatively small minority will care, most will happily take what they're given (even if, paradoxically, they spend time complaining about the thing).

It's not a matter of logic/reason/rationality. It all comes down to "I don't want to think; just give me the good feeling."


Irrelevant issue for 99.9% of businesses


Another thread about Edge.js has some similar concepts that might be applicable? They're not 1:1 the same but it involves Sandboxing https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47417398


I would put virtual or filesystem abstractions in a different category than sandboxing, which puts restrictions over the virtual or native implementations.


I mean that's a fair distinction. There's definitely some overlap depending on needs though.


They have Their Link.com product which integrates pretty seamlessly. It just doesn't store balances or anything akin to PayPal, Venmo, Cashapp, Apple Pay/Cash, etc.


The ability to auto-fill the text/email verification codes is a huge one.


+1 for dokploy, it's very flexible and allows me to setup my sites how I need. Especially as it concerns to the way I setup a static landing page, then /app goes to the react app. And /auth goes to a separate auth service, etc.


Whatever the speed of light is I would imagine


No, that's just an optimization that saved on computing resources. It effectively allows the party that runs this simulation to have a limited world to simulate. Dark matter is the other half of that trick. Both were invented by one Bebele Zropaxhodb after a particularly interesting party in the universe just above this one...


That's the rendering speed.


We gave it advanced pattern recognition.


But you repeat what the parent said, Why did you say "we gave it intelligence" again?


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: