That's some really gross toxic-positivity begging.

You can do better

THEN: "You can't violate our copyright because it's ours and belongs to us."

NOW: "We can violate your copyright because we want to."

YOU: "Where's mine, and how do I make more people click on these ads?"

Trump voters doing Trump voter things.

https://old.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/1slngfa/the_fcc_j...

https://old.reddit.com/r/pwnhub/comments/1s1zz4l/fcc_bans_fo...

https://old.reddit.com/r/pwnhub/comments/1s2thgj/the_fcc_rou...

The posts are AI slop but not incorrect. I didn't have to look anything up to know there was some kind of bribery or insider corruption going on here.

Thank you for considering violence against corporate totalitarianism. Please choose one of the following:

A: Violence now!

B: Maybe later.

> CEO of MZLA (the Mozilla entity that develops Thunderbird).

Was it really too hard to say "I am the" or add "here" at the end? Instead we get this lazy "words hard less wrds good" manner of speaking.

Why use many word when few word do trick.

I meant to have a "here" at the end, just typed while excited. Typically known for using too many words.

lol

Remember when Jobs of Apple died?

Now think about what is going to happen when Musk dies. Compare and contrast.

I got scammed on Swappa about six months ago. I was buying a used Google Pixel tablet in "mint" condition. It was really used and terribly scratched up.

Swappa staff were unhelpful and only after I opened a dispute with Paypal did I get my money back.

I don't blame Swappa for a random dodgy seller, but this was an "Enterprise" seller, whom is still selling on Swappa today!

See this reddit review, which isn't mine, but is almost exactly what I dealt with.

https://reddit.com/r/Scams/comments/1d8emzf/suckered_on_swap...

Reading OP's post, I can't help but wonder if they bought a Verizon Pixel. This is a very very well-known gotcha. Verizon locks their bootloaders and you can't bootloader-unlock Verizon Pixels, even after they are carrier-unlocked.

You didn't read it or understand it.

You're joking, but still: that's one very possible outcome of both requiring centrally issued certificates for security reasons and browsers refusing to display websites without.

Effectively certificates are now a license to publish.

On a PC we atleast have an out.

On mobile, user certs are pretty much ignored unless opted in by apps. Even firefox allows user certs (for now) but only via an obscure hidden config.

This means we cannot use self-hosted services even using a VPN with official apps without getting a signed cert.

> This means we cannot use self-hosted services even using a VPN with official apps without getting a signed cert.

What do you mean by this? Any service that is designed to be self-hosted will have an app that accepts user-installed CAs. HomeAssistant, for example.

It's regrettable that you would spread misinformation, and easily explained/debunked information at that. This is a reasonably well-known issue and even with the extremely bad and limited information you provided (no model numbers or other info), I already know exactly what your problem is.