Fabien if you are reading this. What keyboard is that? It looks like you have removable switches given the gap, but the key caps also look quite thin making the gap more pronounced. Curious what you got going there.
Nobody does, that's why you can claim you didn't know. The law has to respect what most of society would do. Famously, hockey teams were held liable for people getting injured by flying pucks, despite each ticket to the game having an agreement that if bought the ticket you accepted the risk. But nobody reads the back of the ticket. In the end the arena put up nets to catch the pucks.
Um. Yes. Technically yes. And in several different ways too. I do not necessarily want to assume what you intended to write here. Would you care to elaborate a little? I was going to open with a history of law and how certain level of distance of court from the mob's wishes is desirable for a societal reason, but I decided against it since I might be assuming what you were trying to say.
"Halioua says she has nothing against cats—and has even hired a few cat fanciers—but that their long lives, dislike of medicine, and not-very-humanlike physiology make them a less appealing target. 'They’re like little biological aliens,' Halioua says."
There was a quite a difficult math course at my university, the solution they found was to split the course into two courses. Seemed liked a sensible solution.
When I read articles like this I feel there must be more to the story if both sides are so dug in that they cannot find an amicable solution.
It should be noted too that this an opinion piece and the author seems quick to blame this on racial diversity quotas.
It doesn't appear to be the course. There are other professors teaching this same course yet they don't have the abysmal professor reviews. Sometimes professors need to be shown the door.
