Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Shitty-kitty's commentslogin

They love America using it's might, infact it is what they demand. Their issue was not with wars but with Nation building. The endless wars were atributed to miguded attempts to introduce Democracy. America should simply crush their enemies with superiror might and force them to do our bidding. Well that's not turning out to be so easiy either.

> The endless wars were atributed to miguded attempts to introduce Democracy.

Where they really in plural? Where exactly other then Afghanistan? I can think of more places where America explicitly overturned democracy (Iran, Chile) then places where it try to install one.


I'm not talking about reality, just their beliefs.

The advatange they have is that all 4 of their major metropolitan areas are in a straight line across flat land. The enemy of high-speed is any diviations from flat and straigh. On he accela top speed can be maintained less then 40% of the trip.

All the major metro areas on the Acela corridor are also on a straight line, on significantly flatter land than Japan. Notice how the Acela never spends 10+ minute periods in long, deep tunnels under mountain ranges. The Acela primarily spends most of the trip going below 100 mph because it is operating on 100+ year old infrastructure that has only ever been upgraded piecemeal as it starts to fail.

It's always feels funny to me when taking the Acela between Boston and NYC that you go screaming along at 150mph... for a small portion of track in Rhode Island. The rest of the time you're going much slower. It's almost like, why even bother for that small section?

The Shinkansen was a very different experience when I took it.


Japan isn't that flat. The Tokaido Shinkansen has 70km of tunnels (12% of the route), and for the new maglev Shinkansen, they're boring 250 km of tunnels (90% of the route!)

The problem is the split CDNA/RDNA architecture. A problem they are adressing with their upcoming unified UDMA.

The splist CDNA/RDNA architecture is a problem for AMD. The upcoming unified UDMA will solve the issue.


a 10 year lead can't be closed overnight but Intel had a even larger lead and look how the mighty have fallen.


Intel was never famous for good GPUs, and they are basically the only ones still trying to make something out of OpenCL, with most of the tooling going beyond what Khronos offers.

one API is much more than a plain old SYCL distribution, and still.


I meant their CPU supremaciy. ;)


That still reigns in PCs and servers.

People like to talk about Apple CPUs, but keep forgetting they don't sell chips, and overall desktop market is around 10% world wide.

ARM is mostly about phones and tablets, good luck finally getting those Windows ARM or GNU/Linux desktop cases or laptops.

Servers, depends pretty much about which hyperscalers we are on.

RISC-V is still to be seen, on the desktop, laptops and servers.

Where AMD is doing great are game consoles.


Intel still has 60% server market share but it is in free fall https://wccftech.com/intel-server-client-cpu-market-share-hu...


Also on pace to drop below AMD on the Steam hardware survey this year


The same Steam hardware survey whose quality is questioned about when we talk about Linux adoption numbers?


Interesting information, that leaves desktop and laptop markets, where AMD still has adoption issues especially on laptops.


Between the MacBook Neo on the low end and Strix Halo on they high end Intel is in for some tougher laptop competition


Outside US, and countries with similar salary levels, people don't earn enough for Apple tax served with 8 GB.


Try not to rely on Intel too much. They cut products with promise all the time because they miss quarterly numbers.


I'd argue Intel fell is large part because of Intel's own complacency and incompetence. If Intel had taken AMD seriously, they'd probably still be a serious competitor today.


Funny, TAP runs straight-thru Albania. They could just build a gas power station. Of course rented rigs line the pockets much better.


Why would they want to do that?


Building something is cheaper than renting it forever?


Nobody seriously doubts the "tension" anymore. The analysis is good.

The question is are there systemic errors. Chief among them is whether our ability to infer the distance to objects billions of light years away is truly as good as we think it is.


According to the article “This work effectively rules out explanations of the Hubble tension that rely on a single overlooked error in local distance measurements". So any systemic errors would need to affect multiple measurement types.


Definitely a good first step if their research holds up. Given the huge implications thou, it is unlikely to sway opinions much.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence


We don't just use one single method to infer distances. TA is about that there are multiple methods, and that the framework is open for new ones. What is more likely at fault is the underlying model of how the cosmos developed, which is highly likely to be incomplete or misguided.


Actually is quite the opposite. If the difference in expansion between the early and late universe is real than the reigning cosmological model lambda-CDM will at least have to be revised, or be replaced with a model that made that prediction (there are several of them)


I was referring to that model :-)


The lack of plate tectonics is a much bigger obstacle on Super-Earths, then g.


Yeah the more I learn the more I buy the rare Earth explanation.

Life may not be that unusual but it might be mostly just goo: little extremophile type bacteria and maybe very tiny creepy crawlies living in deep seas, underground, in liquid mantles in ice moons, etc.

But to get stuff even as sophisticated as frogs and bunnies, let alone something that can try space flight, requires a place that is all of: big, stable, with abundant energy, with high enough metallicity, and in an environment well shielded from flares and impacts.

There may not be a lot of places like this.


Stability is definitely good but excessive stability leads to stagnation. A perfect example of this is what's been coined as the "boring billion"

"In 1995, geologists Roger Buick, Davis Des Marais, and Andrew Knoll reviewed the apparent lack of major biological, geological, and climatic events during the Mesoproterozoic era 1.6 to 1 billion years ago (Ga), and, thus, described it as "the dullest time in Earth's history"


You might enjoy reading about theorized “Superhabitable” planets. A super earth with about twice the mass of Earth would likely have plate tectonics and even more internal heat. Plus, if it orbits a K-type star that’s about 85% of the mass of the Sun, it could remain habitable for tens of billions of years.

By comparison, Earth may be barely habitable. It is amusing to think that we may be living on the galactic equivalent of Australia.

Perhaps the upside is that our gravity well is low enough to make routine spaceflight possible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superhabitable_world


It's a forest, not an orchard, and most species fruit only once a year. The most important is the strangler fig tree as it produces fruit multiple times a year.


Lions and Hyanas are well known for trying to exterminate each other's cubs (they rarely eat the carcases). Adults mostly avoid fighting each other as its too risky.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: